Hammersmith & City and Circle lines
SIS: A Sinister Agenda?
Submitted on 18 February, 2010 - 10:53
Thankfully, strong union representation has reined in some of the worst abuses of the SIS / mystery snooper survey.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Wot No Fire Cover?
Submitted on 8 January, 2010 - 06:28
Last month, there was water ingress at Paddington and the Fire Control Panel did not work. So had there been a fire, the system would not necessarily have kicked in to detect and suppress it.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Vicious Circle
Submitted on 19 December, 2009 - 09:10
The new Circle line - confusing for passengers, more work for station staff, forcing passengers to change at Edgware Road (up and down stairs, not easy for people who are mobility impaired, with pushchairs and luggage). The critical position of Edgware Road means that problems there impact heavily on the whole of the sub-surface lines.
Hammersmith Heading for Action
Submitted on 16 November, 2009 - 11:24
It seems that both ASLEF and RMT are heading for dispute at Hammersmith depot, so we could see a rare but welcome show of unity.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
New Jobs, But Not Good News
Submitted on 4 November, 2009 - 15:13
Edgware Road management want to create three new Station Supervisor jobs. Usually, new jobs would be good news. But in this case, it may not be.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Imposed rosters at Kings Cross
Submitted on 14 April, 2009 - 11:55
When management at King's Cross came up with a new roster, it was put to the staff, who found a few problems with it.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Disabling the QBM
Submitted on 30 March, 2009 - 20:22
In LUL's latest effort to drive its own customers away, company management called Cubic to the Pentonville Road side of King's Cross station today to disable the ticket-issuing facility on the Queue Busting Machine (QBM).
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
KX7 - Waste of Time?
Submitted on 19 December, 2008 - 18:36
Readers will recall that LUL management got themselves in a right fluster about seven Kings Cross SAMFs who walked out of the ticket office for 40 minutes in protest at the SRT being used to cover a rostered duty.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
LUL Disciplines Kings Cross 7
Submitted on 28 November, 2008 - 19:46
LUL is pursuing its disciplinary action against the 'Kings Cross 7', SAMFs who quite rightly walked out of the ticket office in protest against the deployment of an SRT Supervisor to cover a duty, in
Roster Rejected
Submitted on 27 November, 2008 - 11:43
Kings Cross management wanted to bring in a new roster for CSAs, but staff objected because of various issues including the lack of decent rest periods.
Under-Staffed Station Opens
Submitted on 19 October, 2008 - 11:58
Happily - or perhaps luckily - for LUL, Wood Lane station opened last Sunday without much of a hitch. This is indeed good fortune on the company's part, as the station is woefully understaffed.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Disciplined For Defending Company Policy
Submitted on 9 October, 2008 - 08:37
Word reaches Tubeworker that the King's Cross staff who walked out to prevent abuse of the SRT are to face disciplinary action. So it's not a disciplinary offence for management to break the agreements that they themselves signed, but it is a crime to defend those agreements?!
Kings Cross Staff Walk Out Against Management Abuses
Submitted on 18 September, 2008 - 13:10
Yesterday morning, ticket office staff at Kings Cross walked out when management once again broke their own rules by using a member of the Special Requirements Team (SRT) to cover a duty.
Wood Lane Rosters Joke
Submitted on 5 September, 2008 - 19:03
LUL intends to open the new Wood Lane station next month, but seems to have overlooked staffing it properly.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Thanks To You ...
Submitted on 16 July, 2008 - 17:37... but not so much thanks to you.
Management decided to reward King's Cross staff for dealing so professionally with the chaos on booze ban party night. Anyone would think management were embarrassed by their own inadequate preparation.
The £100 'Thanks To You' vouchers were most welcome - until staff discovered that some of their workmates had only got a tenner.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Staff Assaulted As LUL Fails To Protect Us During Booze Party
Submitted on 1 June, 2008 - 10:32- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
How Visible?
Submitted on 21 April, 2008 - 09:40
If you have travelled through Kings Cross of late, you will have noticed that staff are wearing orange HiVis all day (and if you work there, you will obviously know this!).
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Thameslink Transfer
Submitted on 6 October, 2007 - 23:00
As well as the impending Silverlink transfer, there's another transfer in the offing - King's Cross Thameslink station is coming over to LUL on 9th December.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
No Deadman, No Driver
Submitted on 26 September, 2007 - 19:42
The Circle and Hammersmith & City lines and the District line's Wimbledon branch have come to a halt this evening as drivers refuse to go along with management's wish to operate trains that may be fatally unsafe.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
One Station, One Roster
Submitted on 12 September, 2007 - 07:16
Management want to introduce a joint 9-week roster for Supervisors at Farringdon and Barbican station.
Their 'carrot' is that Barbican will thus be upgraded and its rostered Supervisors get a bit of a pay rise. But no-one should accept this bribe, and should instead recognise the danger of this proposal. It's the thick end of a very very thick wedge. If management get this in, then next it'll be more 2-station rosters, then 3-station rosters, then more.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Crumbling Platforms
Submitted on 11 September, 2007 - 06:50
Down at Kings Cross, platform 2 is crumbling beneath the feet.
It seems that to avoid raising the nosing stones, and thus save some dosh, Metronet decided to use 8mm tiles, less than half the usual thickness.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Communication Breakdown
Submitted on 10 September, 2007 - 16:48
With a person on the track near Paddington, a driver was told by the Line Controller to remain at Royal Oak. The driver then got another call on the Connect system - which shows an 8-digit code rather than a caller ID - telling him to reform and giving authority to proceed, which he did.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
A Bit Dim
Submitted on 28 August, 2007 - 12:15
Barking sidings are so dark as to be unsafe. The measure for lighting levels is such that over 30 is OK, between 20 and 30 requires a risk assessment, less than 20 and the location should close until the problem is rectified. The level at Barking sidings? 4.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Danger: Don't Touch
Submitted on 20 May, 2007 - 15:43
We all know that cleaning standards are not great on the Underground (not because of the cleaners themselves, but because of cowboy contractors and management's general disregard for safety standards). But few of us would have considered that we might risk facial paralysis just by touching some kit.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Who Put That Switch There?
Submitted on 21 September, 2006 - 13:20
Monday evening, the District Line was suspended for half an hour, H&C and Circle also suspended, and delays continued well into the evening.
The reason? Loss of train radio from Earl's Court. The reason for that? The Connect project had installed a changeover switch on the desk during the night, but not got round to telling anyone who actually works in the Control Room. Unsurprisingly, the switch was accidentally operated.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Hello? Is Anyone there?
Submitted on 28 July, 2006 - 10:26
On 20th July in the evening peak, parts of the Underground lost their phone systems. At Paddington, the Station Supervisors, realising they could not contact the Line Controller, Police, Network Control, etc, evacuated and closed the station. Quite right too.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Low Risk?
Submitted on 7 July, 2006 - 10:32
It's OK, everyone. Calm down. King's Cross is a 'low-risk' station. We know this because London Underground Ltd says so.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
MEL
Submitted on 8 June, 2006 - 22:40
MEL (manual electronic logging) at Whitechapel cabin has been withdrawn permanently. This is thanks in large part to a lot of hard work by the local health and safety rep - and a good example of what difference an effective H&S rep can make.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Operational Standards?
Submitted on 7 October, 2005 - 13:46
Management think they have a procedure (OSN48) that allows trains to run safely without working radio.
We disagree. But would it be too much to expect them to stick to their own procedure?!
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Refusing to Drive
Submitted on 12 September, 2005 - 07:30
A few months back, dozens of Edgware Road train ops refused to drive their trains when the radios failed. Quite right too.
Management's response? A disciplinary letter! Looking out for the safety of thousands of passengers (and yourself) is obviously very very naughty.



