Pay
Pay: The Fight Starts Now!
Submitted on 9 May, 2008 - 10:09
Our current pay deal on LUL runs out next April, but the fight for a decent new deal must start now.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
CSS Bonus - Dangling the Proverbial Carrot
Submitted on 18 April, 2008 - 08:18
LUL Employee communications released the CSS (Customer Satisfaction Survey) results for 2007/8 in an internal bulletin on the 10th April.
Wot No Bonus?
Submitted on 30 April, 2007 - 08:16
Our beloved leader Tim O'Toole has written to us again. Bless him for taking time out of his busy schedule to keep us informed of the state of play of our magnificent system.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Pull the pay fights together
Submitted on 24 April, 2006 - 10:05
Meanwhile, TubeLines have settled for a two-year deal with a 4% rise this year.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
What's Wrong with Performance-Related Pay?
Submitted on 5 February, 2006 - 12:49
Employee Relations Director Gerry Duffy has given a few hints as to what might be coming our way in the upcoming pay negotiations.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
TubeLines pay claim
Submitted on 24 January, 2006 - 09:34
RMT has submitted its pay claim to TubeLines, and TubeLines has responded. So the opening skirmishes will begin.
RMT has asked for a one-year deal and a 'substantial' pay rise for staff. It is the general practice of the union not to put a figure on its pay claims. Tubeworker tends to think that it would be better if it did, so that the workforce knows what it is fighting for, and can see if the union is trying to sell it short. Which, we suspect, is why the union bureaucracy prefers the vague term 'substantial'!
RMT wins Tribunal for equal pay for AG1
Submitted on 8 December, 2005 - 22:07
At Stratford Tribunal on 2 December, a decision was given that awards an AG1 six years back pay on an equal pay case that lasted three days. After hearing evidence that brings the whole question of performance-related pay into question, the Tribunal refused LUL the right to appeal a decision that could send shock waves around the business world.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version



