Socialism and Democracy
Expounding a Marxist view of democracy, revolution, socialism, and Stalinism, in reply to Michael Foot.
Socialism and Democracy
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:19
Socialism and Democracy: Workers' Liberty special issue (no.17), January 1994
------
Download as pdf:
- debate from 1982 between Michael Foot, then Labour Party leader, and John O'Mahony, with a 1994 introduction
- appendices, including texts on socialism and democracy by James P Cannon, Max Shachtman, V I Lenin, and Hal Draper.
------
Read online:
Introduction: Democracy, direct action, and the class struggle
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 1)
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 2)
John O'Mahony: Introduction
Chapter 1: Is Direct Action Against Thatcher Undemocratic?
Chapter 2: The Appeal to History
Chapter 3: The Scarecrow of Stalinism
Chapter 4: Superstition or Struggle?
Appendix 1. Labour Party: the sham of "one member, one vote" - John Bloxam and John O'Mahony
Appendix 2. PR, democracy, and socialism - John O'Mahony
Appendix 3. Marxism and democracy - James P Cannon
Appendix 4. The movement of the majority - James P Cannon
Appendix 5. 1917 was a democratic revolution - Max Shachtman
Appendix 6. Lenin on Democracy and Dictatorship
Appendix 7. Democracy in the Russian Revolution - Leon Trotsky (1918)
Appendix 8. An Eyewitness Account of the Russian Revolution- Hal Draper
Appendix 7 and appendix 8, included here, were not in the printed version of January 1994.
1917 was a democratic revolution!
Submitted on 4 August, 2007 - 18:07
By Max Shachtman
The 1917 revolution was one of the greatest democratic moments in history.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Socialism and democracy: appendices
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:11
Appendices to the Workers' Liberty pamphlet, with texts by James P Cannon, Max Shachtman, V I Lenin, and Hal Draper on socialism, democracy, and the Russian Revolution of 1917; and articles by John Bl
Socialism and Democracy: the Foot/ O'Mahony debate
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:08
Debate between then Labour Party leader Michael Foot, and John O'Mahony, in 1982 on socialism and democracy, with a 1994 introduction.
Marxism and democracy
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 13:15
By James P Cannon. This is an extract from Cannon's reply to a criticism of his court evidence in 1941.
Comrade Munis [1] is dissatisfied with our assertions at the trial that “we submit to the majority”.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
The movement of the majority
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 12:45
By James P Cannon, from Socialism on Trial, 1941. This is an extract from Cannon's evidence in the court where, during World War 2, he and other American Trotskyists and trade unionists were put on trial and jailed for hindering the US war effort.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
PR, democracy, and sociaIism
Submitted on 7 April, 2007 - 18:49
By John O'Mahony
(Socialist Organiser, 5 January 1989)
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Labour Party: the sham of "one member, one vote"
Submitted on 7 April, 2007 - 18:42
By John Bloxam and John O'Mahony
"After the rising of the 17th of June [the East Berlin workers uprising of 1953] the Secretary of the Writers Union had leaflets handed out in the Stalinallee in which it can be read that the people had forfeited the confidence of the government, and could only win it back by redoubled efforts. Would it not be simpler if the government dissolved the people and elected another?"
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Lenin on democracy and dictatorship
Submitted on 5 April, 2007 - 13:32
Lenin called for the "dictatorship of the proletariat" as a great expansion of democracy.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Introduction: democracy, direct action and class struggle, by John O'Mahony
Submitted on 25 March, 2007 - 20:23
Note, March 2007:
Michael Foot, then leader of the Labour Party, wrote the articles reproduced here on democracy, revolution, socialism, and Stalinism in the Observer. John O'Mahony wrote the reply in Socialist Organiser.
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 1)
Submitted on 25 March, 2007 - 20:18
Why parliament? Can those old arthritic limbs still move as the nation needs?
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 2)
Submitted on 25 March, 2007 - 20:09
Part 1.
Off and on during these past two and a half years since Labour's electoral defeat of May 1979, Goldsmith's famous lines have floated incongruously through my mind:
Chapter 4: Superstition or struggle?
Submitted on 24 August, 2004 - 14:07
Chapter 4: Superstition or struggle?
The workers against Stalinism
The search for the original sin of Bolshevism has exercised tired and demoralised socialists for at least 50 years. Like characters in an ancient Greek drama, they seek the explanation for the Stalinist plague in some violated taboo.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Chapter 3: The scarecrow of Stalinism
Submitted on 24 August, 2004 - 14:05
Chapter 3: The scarecrow of Stalinism
Can the tiger be skinned claw by claw?
In part 2 of his written oration on parliamentary democracy and those whom he denounces as its enemies (Observer, January 17 1982), Michael Foot attempts to answer the challenge he had posed to himself in part one.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Chapter 2: The appeal to history
Submitted on 24 August, 2004 - 14:00
Chapter 2: The appeal to history
Foot's safe good causes
Foot invokes the saints of British radicalism (even the suffragettes - who were, technically, small-scale terrorists and mostly not at all radical except on votes for women). He justifies their extraparliamentary actions and claims their tradition for himself.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Chapter 1: Direct action and democracy
Submitted on 24 August, 2004 - 13:58
Chapter 1: Is direct action against an elected capitalist government undemocratic?
Marxists are democrats
Introduction : Socialism and Democracy
Submitted on 24 August, 2004 - 13:55
The cry "For Parliamentary Democracy: the Trotskyists are the enemy of democracy" is - perhaps predictably - the political standard under which Labour's right and soft left are trying to rally forces for a counter-offensive against the serious left.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version

