For most Tamils in the world today, the events of the last month have been devastating but they must also have been expected - including our seeming powerlessness and unwillingness to do very much about it for the better. Maybe 300 Tamils have been killed in the last few days by Sri Lankan Army shelling; 300,000 civilians are trapped in a full-scale warzone being denied the right to leave by the Tigers or genuine safe passage and humanitarian aid by the Sri Lankan government.
There is objective reason to see that this moment is a crucial juncture in this long war, demanding the action and solidarity of all those who stand for freedom and equality and peace. Millions now across the world have chanted “We are all Palestinians”; will the same be said of the Tamils at this hour; the Congolese, the Somalis, the Kashmiris, the Darfuris?
Can we build a global movement against the wars waged by the co-ordinated action of capitalist States, and undermine the social relations that support them everywhere? Can we at the same time oppose as dead ends the reactionary and repressive forces that grow from ordinary resistance to oppression - but rule over it in the end for their own limited interests (which are posed as identical to the needs and aspirations of ‘the people’).
Can there be a renewed internationalist working-class fight for democratic socialism as the positive alternative to this barbarism?
The seizure of the de facto Tamil Tiger capital Kilinochchi on 2nd January 2009 came exactly a year after the Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapackse formally abrogated the Norwegian brokered ceasefire of 2002, and declared there could only be a military solution to defeating the Liberation Tamil Tigers of Eelam – the wisdom of the War against Terror we have come to know so well around the world. This is the conventional military endgame, a victory for the Sri Lankan Army, but could also usher in a renewed period of guerrilla warfare and suicide bombings on state personnel and civilians that the Tigers are renowned for.
The President’s stance jettisons all previous Sri Lankan consensuses that there must ultimately be a political solution negotiated with the LTTE. This ground has been prepared by an international ban on the organisation, in the US since 1997 and in the EU since 2006. India renewed its ban for a further two years in the midst of fierce fighting just last November. The US applauded the capture of Kilinochchi and reiterated that there can be no negotiation with terrorists. No socialist organisation in Sri Lanka has supported the ban, though some vehemently oppose the Tigers. The ban has already had a far-reaching impact. For sure, money still flows from Europe and the rest of the diaspora to the Tigers (an estimated 40% of LTTE funds come from the UK), whereas political space has been drastically shut down including for any kind of peace process soon.
In the UK, the British Tamil Forum which supports the Tigers has opted to lobby inanely for peace and human rights and self-determination in the abstract, refusing to campaign for the ban to be lifted for fear of the ban itself imposing on their comfortable lives. My uncle, Dr Vinayagamoorthy, a GP in Enfield, North London has been detained for two years in the US under counter-terrorism powers without having been brought to trial. He has a record of working with the LTTE for peace and for self-determination for the Tamils. After years of violently suppressing most other Tamil opposition on its watch, the LTTE has become the accepted face of the Northern Tamils for many, whether they like it or not. It is a testament to the contradictory attitudes of the Tamil diaspora that when longstanding LTTE peace negotiator Anton Balasingham died in December 2006, some 70,000 filed past his coffin at Alexandra Palace in North London; LTTE heroes day on the 27th November attracted far fewer people, and even then numbers were mainly due to the fighting. The Sri Lanka Democracy forum is hostile to the LTTE and the Tamil Information Centre concentrates on human rights issues.
Over the last two years, the human rights abuses perpetrated by the Sri Lankan state have been so terrible and open that even the US and India have had to stem direct military aid to the government. China, Iran and Pakistan have had no such qualms and have stepped in as the main creditor-lifeline-exploiters as part of their political counter manoeuvrings. The EU have maintained preferential trade agreements signed after the Tsunami, called GSP+, which are supposed to be tied to labour, environmental and human rights standards. These constitute 2% of GDP for Sri Lanka and also deliver the products of high-skilled sweated labour to Europe. GSP+ is due to have lapsed at the end last year. Perhaps the liberal tears shed over the assassination of the Sunday Leader editor and his dramatic death note reprinted by the Guardian and the Times will force the UK to do something. While Brown advocated a ceasefire in a PM’s question time, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office statement doggedly avoided calling for a ceasefire, let alone an end to the occupation or negotiations with the LTTE.
Rajapackse’s war has been overwhelmingly supported by the Sinhalese working-class. He himself was known previously as a defender of human rights and seems to have been promoted because of his rural ‘low-country origins’, as a means of stemming the rapid growth of the JVP movement in its recent parliamentary form. The JVP, which in some ways mirrors the Tigers among the poor in the rural south, is virulently anti-Tiger, as is the Buddhist-fascist NHP, both of which prop up the government’s ruling coalition. The war’s popularity, combined with court injunctions and state repression, has kept down latent strike action among the Sinhala working class despite the highest inflation in South Asia. The 7% growth in the economy largely benefits the rich and better-off skilled workers in the west of the island. For the low-country Sinhalese, joining the army is one way for a young person to generate income for his family.
The war is unsurprisingly opposed by most Tamils and other minorities though whether this translates as support for the LTTE is difficult to tell. The Tigers have tightened up their regime of forced recruitment over the last two years, have started recruiting 17 year olds again, and have imposed forced frontline labour on the relatives of those who have failed to return to ‘Eelam’, the LTTE condition for granting passes to leave. Whether the thousands fleeing to India over the last months have done so with permission is unclear; with journalists banned and terrorised throughout Sri Lanka, getting a clear picture is difficult.
Communal-class conflict is responsible for more than 70,000 murders over the last 30 years; hundreds of thousands of migrations; countless thousands of victims of abduction, extrajudicial killing, torture, maiming and rape; the youth of the poor have been exterminated through an island-wide war machine and in communal riots. Understanding the economic development of Sri Lanka, and the history of class formation and struggle on the island, is necessary to understand the ideological and political fault lines of the country today. Likewise, we can not look at the Tamil struggle or the future for Sri Lanka through the eyes of previous generations alone.
30,000 Sri Lankans were wiped out by the Tsunami: that the Tamils came out worse, immediately and thereafter, fits the gross logic of the current reality. Tens of thousands were made homeless and lost their livelihoods to cyclone ‘Nisha’ last November. That the Northern and Eastern provinces of the island, the terrain of the would-be Tamil homeland of Eelam, may be claimed by the sea in decades due to climate change, is a shattering irony. Things have changed, the Tigers have suffered an immense set back. In the days after Kilinochchi fell, the remaining strongholds that had been under Tiger control for the last 10-15 years were taken. There are now more than 100,000 Sri Lankan Army troops occupying the North, and the Tigers have been driven back to villages and jungle holding with them 300,000 civilians and aid workers, who are now being killed in the crossfire.
The SLA is known to have detained all those who tried to leave the Vanni region up to now. After the recent rounding-up and forced registration of all Tamils in Colombo, and the widespread sense that this government is genocidal - with or without the LTTE - the Tamil people are currently a separate and oppressed people under siege. Ominously, the Sri Lankan government issued a new statement on 7th January banning the LTTE!... And all other organisations deemed to be supporting them. This is a sign that the war against the Tigers is to be generalised in to an escalated war against all opposition, namely the trade unions and leftists and Tamils and plantation workers - the masses that are tired of a war and economic hardship that the Sri Lankan State is unable to solve.
The situation is bleak. Over the last two years 200,000 Tamils have been internally displaced as a result of the first part of the strategy to defeat the Tigers. In the Eastern Province, Pillayan, leader of an armed breakaway from the LTTE, is now in power in concert with Rajapackse. The elections were characterised by the open violence of his TMVP armed thugs in a process that de-merged the Northern and Eastern provinces. It was boycotted by the Tamil National Alliance (though the United Socialist Party contested it). De-merger was a blow to one of the agreed principles of Tamil sovereignty that underpinned previous peace talks. Some commentators talk of the government implementing the 13th amendment, a provision of the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord of 1987, which would strengthen provincial autonomy. But few people even know about this legal relic. It is rejected in advance by the Tigers as a sleight of hand, and even by Pillayan as ‘just a step’.
Our solidarity should go to those sections of the international socialist movement and trade unions that have a proven record of fighting for equal rights in Sri Lanka. It appears to me that what remains of the LTTE should be granted an amnesty, as a means to shifting this violent conflict onto political tracks. There must be a full accounting of human rights abuses on both sides, with full reparations paid to individuals and to rebuild civilian life across the country. Immediately there must be a ceasefire and the delivery of humanitarian aid and the release and safe passage of civilians. A democratic solution to this tragedy must allow for the self-determination of Tamils, including a separate state, even if this is a petty-bourgeois dream maintained by the Tamil diaspora as an answer to the oppression faced by the decimated Tamil population that remains.
There is deep affinity with the suffering of Tamils in the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu; increasing solidarity and co-ordination between workers in the garment industry and other sectors across the region. During the No Sweat tour, Shahida Sarkar, president of the Bangladeshi garment workers’ federation, told me of a protest she had organised in solidarity with the Tamil workers.
The main hope has to lie with the Sinhala working-class. Class-lines need to be redrawn. Sinhala chauvinism has stunted the working-class almost from the outset; it is the opium of the Sinhala workers, uniting them with their exploiters. The struggles that have been in abeyance the last year while the people have suffered for the war effort will have to find their resolution. It is vital that socialists in Sri Lanka are supported for socialist reform and working class-revolution, not a fascist purging of the Tamils.
In the 1920s and 30s, students from Ceylon in London became socialists and built up a formidable force for socialism in Sri Lanka. Such collective heritage needs to be remembered and renewed for our times in a process of understanding the real roots of this conflict: a historical and material understanding which gives rise to progressive solutions - as opposed to the expedient myths and legends of Sinhala supremacist and Tamil nationhood narratives that accompany communal war.
Today, hundreds of thousands of Tamils live across the world, an estimated 150,000 in the UK and many Sinhalese who want an end to this war, especially students. The official diaspora movements funnel Tamil solidarity through fundraising and weak political lobbying, promoting communalist patronage of local politicians of all parties. It is an urgent duty of solidarity for those workers and students to organise as part of the class struggles across the world and to act for peace and workers’ unity in Sri Lanka and across South Asia.
Workers’ Liberty will be joining the upcoming protests and will be holding meetings in Tamil areas in London and will work with socialist groups in the UK who have sections in Sri Lanka. There have been discussions to launch a trade union solidarity campaign which effectively ended following the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi by the Tigers in 1991.
A programme for today should be conceived along the lines of internationalist socialism so impressively demonstrated by the Trotskyist pioneers of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party, but driving forward working-class consciousness and political self-education to push beyond the racist and communalist fetters that have divided, subjugated and brutalised the Sri Lankan working-class for the last decades.
Comments
Trotskyists should be for
Trotskyists should be for self-determination for Tamil-Elam and should defend the Tamil Tigers as the actually existing leadership of the Tamils. Despite their reactionary policies and suppression of all other oppositionists they are the only leadership that they have now, not to defend the Tigers is not to defend the Tamils. This is necessary not only to win the ear of the Tamils but also to combat the chauvinism now so deeply embedded in the Sinhala working class, very similar to the attitude of the Israeli working class, who likewise supported the war of extermination by approximately 80%.
However it is very different to the situation in Israel/Palestine. In Sri Lanka the working class were the first to form a political party and from 1953 to 1964 the Lama Sema Sanks held the fate of the masses in their hands. But they betrayed, they more and more succumbed to electoral cretinism and abandoned their mass base in the Tamil tea planters and in the Sinhala workers community. If the British used divide and rule by promoting the native Tamils as privileged administrators for the
Trotskyists should be for self-determination for Tamil-Elam and should defend the Tamil Tigers as the actually existing leadership of the Tamils. Despite their reactionary policies and suppression of all other oppositionists they are the only leadership that they have now, not to defend the Tigers is not to defend the Tamils. This is necessary not only to win the ear of the Tamils but also to combat the chauvinism now so deeply embedded in the Sinhala working class, very similar to the attitude of the Israeli working class, who likewise supported the war of extermination by approximately 80%.
However it is very different to the situation in Israel/Palestine. In Sri Lanka the working class were the first to form a political party and from 1953 to 1964 the Lama Sema Sanks held the fate of the masses in their hands. But they betrayed, they more and more succumbed to electoral cretinism and abandoned their mass base in the Tamil tea planters and in the Sinhala workers community. If the British used divide and rule by promoting the native Tamils as privileged administrators for the Empire the new Sinhala ruling class after 1948 sough to establish their bourgeois nationalist rule on the basis of Sinhala chauvinism. Despite defending the Tamils on the language and citizenship questions the LSSP entered Bandaranaike’s coalition (Popular Front) government and so assumed responsibility for its actions. Various splits since then have attempted to reassert the Trotskyist Transitional Programme on the national question as well as everywhere else.
When you say ‘Can there be a renewed internationalist working-class fight for democratic socialism as the positive alternative to this barbarism?’ then we must ask what class rules in this ‘democratic socialism’? And in what way it differs from the traditional revolutionary socialist perspective contained in the dictatorship of the proletariat. Are the Sri Lankan masses to fight for a social democratic regime such as we have in Gordon Brown’s Britain? We are sure you have socialist revolution somewhere in mind but it must be spelled out.
• Unconditional but critical support to the Tamil Tigers
• For Tamil Eelam
• For the defeat of the SLA
• For a Socialist Federation of Sri Lanka
• For the right of the working class to organise independent of the Tigers and the government
• Reject Popular Frontism, forge workers unity via the Communist tactic of the United Front of workers organisations
• Build a Trotskyist party based on the Transitional method and Permanent Revolution