Published on Workers' Liberty (http://www.workersliberty.org)
The socialism we fight for
By Simon B
Created 5 Mar 2006 - 12:22pm

Socialism is probably the most misunderstood word in history. Many
describe the murderous Stalinist regimes in Russia and Eastern Europe
that collapsed in 1989-91 as socialist. Others describe the tyrants
now ruling China, North Korea and Cuba as socialist. But those states
have nothing to do with socialism.

For the AWL, socialism means common ownership and democratic
control by the producers - the workers - over what's produced and
distributed. That's how it will end poverty, class inequality,
exploitation, boom-slump cycles and the trashing of the environment.
That's how it will ensure good social provision for all, in place of
the chaos and the inhumanity of the free market.

To make planning democratic, the process will need to be
detailed and interlocking. People in their various industries and
localities will discuss and draw up proposals for planning targets. A
balance will need to be found between local, national and
international issues.

Meetings can be held in work time to maximise attendance.
Each workplace group will be able to elect its own delegate, mandate
him or her, get regular reports, and replace its delegate whenever it
wishes. In this way, socialist democracy will mean more real control
than any democratic procedure in society today.

Elections to administrative and managerial positions will be
for fixed, short periods. Rotation of responsibility will make it
hard for vested interests to dominate. Administrators and managers
will be paid the same as other workers, so that they do not have
privileges to defend.

Three things are necessary for this sort of democracy to work:
1. everyone needs a decent standard of living, so they're not
preoccupied by the struggle to survive or the struggle to get a
better job;
2. the working week is short enough for every worker to have time and
energy to take part in debates;
3. everyone has adequate education.
Without these things, as Marx once put it, "all the old crap" will revive.

Are these things actually possible? Definitely. Capitalism
has generated the technology and the productive capacity to make them
possible.

But not overnight. As a first step, wages will be made more
equal. But there will still be wages. People will have to work for
the reason they work today: you don't have enough to live on if you
don't.

The difference will be that everyone will have the right to a
decent job: workers will have control over conditions of work and
what they produce. But there will still be some
drudgery, and it will still have to be done.

Over time socialism will whittle away wage-labour. More and
more goods - food, transport, housing, education, entertainment,
clothing - will be distributed free ("to each according to their
need") so that people do not need to rely on wages to have access to
these things.

Meanwhile, people will become more aware that their work is
for the common good. Most people will want to contribute to the
common good and the pressure of majority opinion will push along
those who don't.

The development of science and technology will allow us to
reduce drudgery to an absolute minimum, shared out equally.
Enjoyable, creative work (over and above the drudgery) will become
something people want to do, not sharply separated from "leisure".

Of course not everything will be done via meetings. There
will be managers and administrators and they will make decisions. But
they'll be elected and accountable, and paid ordinary wages - not a
privileged class of people separate from everyone else.

At first, some activities will have to be left to the market
economy and the balance of supply and demand. Many smaller
enterprises (like shops and small farms) will remain in private
hands. We will win fuller social control over what we produce as we
become more cooperatively minded, more educated, more skilled.

No perfect model of a socialist society exists. The main 20th
century "models" - those countries that claimed to be socialist -
were not socialist at all. But society has progressed before without
anyone having a blueprint! Capitalism is an advance over feudalism;
but no-one in feudal society had even a vague idea of how capitalism
would work.

We do have general principles about how socialism would work,
and soundly-based theories about why the modern working class is the
class that can make socialism. And general principles are all that's
possible in this case. As socialism liberates the working class, it
will liberate a level of creativity we can't predict in advance.

Socialism will expand individual liberty. By removing most
social constraints, it will free individuals from many of the burdens
that hold them back today. Socialism will create more choice, more
time and more freedom to do the things individuals want to do - to
fulfil their potential, enjoy themselves and learn.

Socialism will not just change the way society works. It will
change people.

We can get an inkling of that change in the transformations
that big class struggles - like the miners' strike of 1984-5 and the
French general strike of 1968 - make in people's minds. Socialism
will be a much bigger and more permanent change in the way people
live, so it will make even bigger transformations possible.

Socialism will be the basis for a revolution in human nature:
removing the fear of being ripped off by our fellow-beings that
affects even the most prosperous workers today.
Socialism is the liberation of humanity from poverty, insecurity,
wage-slavery and state tyranny through taking conscious control of
our destiny.



Source URL: http://www.workersliberty.org/node/5782