Wot No Accident Book?
In depots, stations and offices across the Underground, managers are busily removing Accident Books. They reckon that recording staff accidents is adequately covered in the EIRF (Electronic Incident Reporting Form) system.
It's possible that EIRF meets the legal requirements for recording accidents, but Tubeworker can not help but think that subsuming staff accidents at work into a general incident-reporting system will mean they get less profile and therefore even less priority. They will be recorded alongside everything from service disruptions to ticket office closures to one-unders.
Obviously, there are advantages to the electronic recording of accidents - for example, the increased capacity for statistical analysis and comparison. But why not use Accident books and EIRFs? Duplication? Maybe. But a bit of duplication is surely worth it to ensure that the accidents we suffer in our workplaces - many of them unnecessary and due to management negligence - are properly reported so we are more able to insist they are properly addressed.
- Tubeworker's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version



The other day I was speaking
The other day I was speaking to some (new) station staff and they knew nothing about LU's Passort to Health & Safety, how to report something unsafe or even that something called a What's Wrong form existed. When Management all of a sudden got a load of What's Wrong forms handed in, they weren't too happy. Should the All the Unions make staff more aware of safety reporting procedures as management seem to want to keep quiet on this one.
Too right
... and not just how to report safety problems, but how to refuse to work if you have genuine health & safety concerns.
accident books
I thought that the accident book was a requirement of the Health & Safety at work act?
Rick Grogan
Yes
It is. LUL have convinced the health & safety authorities that the EIRF system qualifies as an Accident Book in terms of the law.
accident books
We should all start sending in EIRFs for stubbed toes and paper cuts.
perhaps that will convince them that we need a seperate logging system.
Rick Grogan