Solidarity newspaper

WL magazine


 

Search Workers' Liberty sites using Scroogle


User login

Change user status...

Join the debate!

We welcome debate and encourage free discussion. Log in with a user name, and you can add comments to the debates on this site. We operate no political censorship, but we reserve the usual editorial right to delete or cut comments which are racist or sexist; advertising; abusive; excessive in volume; or otherwise inappropriate.


Navigation

Ten tips against anti-Semitism

Left anti-semitism

Translation from De Fabel van de illegaal 52/53, summer 2002
(http://www.gebladert.nl)
Authors: Eric Krebbers and Jan Tas

Activists wishing to criticise the Israeli state must be careful not to descend into anti-Semitic reasoning. Here are 10 tips to avoid anti-Semitism in discussions, articles, leaflets and demonstrations.


1. Always also criticise moslim fundamentalists and never justify the suicide bombers.

Hamas, Jihad and Hezbollah are not liberation organisations, but religious fascists. Historically, anti-Semitism is a central element of the Islam, just as it is of Christianity. Moslim fundamentalists call for all Jews to be killed, and are thus extremely anti-Semitic. Anyone who refuses to categorically distance themselves from these fascists and their opportunist methods, whether for anti-imperialist or other reasons, legitimises anti-Semitism. Anyone who ignores the attacks on random Israeli citizens, considers them in some way understandable or justified, is underwriting the anti-Semitic logic behind them, namely that Israeli Jews are always guilty - regardless of whether they agree with their government - just because they are Jewish.

2. Oppose anti-Zionism

Anti-Zionists wrongly claim that Jewish nationalism, Zionism, is per definition on the extreme Right. In reality, Zionism has many different currents, some of which are progressive. Anti-Zionism only opposes Jewish nationalism. Palestinian or Arab nationalism is embraced. However, all forms of nationalism have the same reactionary function. They all produce myths to emphasise the unity of "nations" and to hide the oppression of workers, women and people who do not fit into the nationalist scheme. Elites use nationalism to harness the population for their fight against other elites. In this sense, Jewish nationalism is not fundamentally different from Arab or Dutch nationalism. It is important to combat nationalism at home, and not to do the elites a favour by fighting nationalism in other countries. In addition to this, it is anti-Semitic to, from a European perspective, declare Jewish nationalism to be the main problem. The solution lies in the principle of anti-nationalism and in the support for joint Israeli-Palestinian initiatives for resistance from below.

3. Do not use the term genocide and do not call Israel the biggest abuser of human rights

Israel is one of the many countries which gravely abuses human rights. Many of the national "liberation movements", such as the PLO also abuse human rights, and will continue to do so once they have their own state. Various states in the Middle East, including Syria, Iran and Iraq, also abuse human rights on a massive scale. The much more limited scope of the Israeli abuses of human rights do not justify the title of the biggest abuser of human rights. One sided criticism of Israel smacks of anti-Semitism. Furthermore, the term genocide is exaggerated with regard to Israeli violence. Jenin can not be compared to Rwanda or Yugoslavia. What is more, Israel does not seek the systematic eradication of the other side; unlike the muslim fundamentalist organisations. If for example Hamas had its way, all Jews would be driven into the sea or gassed. Incidentally, more criticism in the direction of human rights abuses on the part of the Dutch government would not go amiss either.

4. Never compare Israel to Nazi Germany

Mercifully, the Shoah is a unique event in human history. In Nazi Germany 6 million Jews were systematically slaughtered. Comparisons between this and other mass murders do no justice to the unimaginable and horrific dimensions of this crime against the Jews. European claims that the Shoah was just like the current Israeli policies of occupation in effect rehabilitate the Nazi's. This could create a space in the future for the re-emergence of the extreme right. And the suggestion that the Israeli's are no better than Hitler can also provide a retrospective justification for the Shoah. "Hitler forgot one: Sharon", was one of the slogans chanted at a pro-Palestine demo in Amsterdam in April 2002.

5. Do not hold "the Jews" accountable for the actions of the Israeli state

It is nonsense to hold "the Jews", "the Palestinians" or 'the Dutch" collectively responsible for anything. There are always huge contradictions inside any "nation". Many Jews in Israel and in other parts of the world deplore the Israeli state violence. Generally, they have little influence over it. Those who claim that people in Israel do not protest enough against the state violence should realise that the Israeli Left, like the Left in other parts of the world, is in a crisis. It is anti-Semitic to demand specifically of the Jews that they adhere to higher political and moral standards. Those who nevertheless hold all Jews responsible for the Israeli state violence, open the way for anti-Semites to attack random Jews and Jewish targets.

6. Do not use anti-Semitic stereotypes

Throughout history, Jews have been portrayed as baby killers and rapists, as demons who poison water supplies, as greedy bankers and speculators and as spineless intellectuals. When the Palestinian solidarity movement employs such stereotypes against Israel, the mobilising effect will be enormous, because of the fact that anti-Semitism everywhere has deep roots. But if a movement does this, it no longer has a place in the Left.

7. Condemn ideas of a pro-Israeli conspiracy

Oft heard suggestion of a pro-Israeli conspiracy in politics, culture, the economy and the media are classic elements of anti-Semitism. Regardless of whether they concern the Dutch or the global context, such allegations lie in the tradition of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", a fraudulent text dating from 1900, claiming that Jews were conspiring to gain world domination. In cartoons the conspiracy was depicted as a giant octopus, holding the world in its deadly tentacles. Today there is much talk of the so called "mighty Jewish lobby" which is alleged to control the media and keep criticism of Israel off the agenda.

8. Do not call Israel an unnatural state

Since nationalism gained ground in Europe and humanity was suddenly divided into "nations", "the Jews" have been regarded as the opposite of a "nation". As such, anti-Semitism is a fixed part of nationalism. In nationalist mythology, "the Jews" represent the evil nemesis of all the good characteristics of the "own nation". Whilst the "own people" were supposedly rooted in the soil of an "own land", the Jews would roam the earth forever and never belong anywhere. According to this logic, a Jewish state would be "unnatural" by definition. For this reason, it is anti-Semitic to pretend that the Palestinians per definition have a real link to their land, whilst the Israeli's per definition do not. The Israeli state is just as "natural" or "unnatural" as any other state.

9. Do not challenge the right of existence of Israel

It is logical for the radical Left to challenge the existence of states and it is equally logical to criticise ones own state. However, Europeans who wish to abolish the state Israel first are caught up in anti-Semitic reasoning. After all, Israel is the state where the European Jews who survived the Shoah sought a safe haven. Now that anti-Semitism internationally is on the increase, many Jews consider Israel the only place on earth where they can flee to in the last resort. By challenging the very right of existence of the state Israel, the feelings of insecurity amongst Jews will only increase. Instead, the Left in Europe should counter anti-Semitism in this continent, so that Jews can feel safe here at home.

10. Never blame Israel for anti Semitism

Anti-Semitism is obviously the responsibility of the anti-Semites. Anti-Semitic thought is deeply rooted in both Europe and the Arabic world. Attacks on Jewish targets have occurred for centuries, also in the Middle East. Anti-Semitic ideas and attacks can therefore not be caused by the existence of the state Israel or by the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel is at best the latest excuse for anti-Semites. Holding Israel responsible for anti-Semitic beliefs is a version of the old idea that "the Jews" are to blame for everything. The same goes for blaming the Jewish secret service, the Mossad, for attacks on Jewish targets in the Middle East and in Europe.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Do not challenge the right of existence of Israel

I agree with what you say apart from 2 and 9.

Zionism is a is a nationalist ideology. It required the creation of a state for jews in what was Palestine, it also required the expulsion of palestinans. The ideology cannot be compared to other nationalist like Dutch nationalism since this form of nationalism, not that I agree with any form of nationalism, does not require the expulsion of non-dutch people. Also note that not all jews are zionists and not all zionists are jews.

Israel only came into existence because 100,000's of Palestinian refugees left what is currently Israel. There are many reasons why they left, these are open to debate and argument, apart from the fact they left. If post the 1948 conflict these refugees had been allowed to return to their homes Israel would not exist in its current form.

So I think

1 Refugees should be allowed to return home.

2 Elections held throughout Israel and the occupied territories.

3 The resulting government would then decide on the nature of the country.

Until this happens I think it is fair to question the validity of Israel.


Holding democratic rights to ransom

The three things you suggest could never happen without the existence of a powerful, unified movement of Israeli and Palestinian workers. Obviously the existence of a movement would be hugely positive but you're essentially saying that you refuse to accept the right of Israelis to self-determination until they've built such a movement.

Some on the left argue in favour of two-states, but stipulate that the states must be socialist. This logic - and yours - holds democratic rights to ransom; it denies rights to people until such a time as they're capable of building massive working-class movements or even socialism itself.

On the issue of Israel's "validity," America and Australia also came into being as a result of ethnic cleansing. Would you question "the validity" of these states? Presumably not - you'd fight for justice for the victims of that ethnic cleansing and continued oppression. But does that mean that the generations of Americans and Australians (and Israelis) who were not responsible for that ethnic cleansing and know no other home do not have national rights?


Whose democtratic rights are

Whose democtratic rights are being held to ransom? I am not sure what you mean "it denies rights to people until such a time as they're capable of building massive working-class movements or even socialism itself." I have not implied any of this. I have not metioned socialism or any other from of state.

Also the analogy of America and Australia is not comparable, although the native populations of were persecuted, they were not expelled. Even today though they are still problems with the treatment of native populations they have equal democratic rights. I am not suggesting that Israeli jews should not be treated differently from christians or muslims. I am suggesting that should have the same rights, no and no less.


Zionist this Zionist that

‘Antizionists’ don't hate jews because of zionism but rather they hate zionism because they hate jews.
If zionism did not exist they would find some other aspect of jews to argue against.

Its one thing to not support Sharon, but its quite another to vilify jews in general.


You are wrong, Antizionists d

You are wrong, Antizionists do not hate jews. Remember that not all jews are zionists and not all zionists are jews.


I assume we are are discussin

I assume we are are discussing the anti-Zionism of the left. In which case you need to say a lot more than this.
For sure most left wingers who call them anti-Zionist do not hate Jews. They are not personally racist towards Jews.
The point is that their political positions — objection to the existence of Israel, a "homeland" for the Jews in any part of the Israel-Palestine territory — is hostile to the Jews of Is-Pal and by extension to those Jews around the world (a majority) who support the existence of Israel.
Unfortunately that hostility is not just a by-product of an otherwise benign position — support for the Jews and Palestinians of Is-Pal to live together in the same territory.
Their political postion and hostility has its roots in the explicitly anti-semitic "anti-Zionist" campaigns of the Stalinist rulers in the late 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s. Among other things the Stalinists identified a capitalist enemy with the Jews. It was "the anti-capitalism of idiots". The Stalinist rulers of the USSR, as was their way, actually persecuted Jews.
But all the ideas of the left about Zionism today — Zionism equal racism, Zionism equals imperialism, Zionism equals the USA's "watchdog", Zionism promotes anti-semitism, these were first introduced by the Stalinists.
The anti-Zionist left remains completely ignorant of this history and determined to not face up to the anti-semitic implications of its political positions.

more: http://www.workersliberty.org/taxonomy/view/or/422


Yes let's say we are talking

Yes let's say we are talking about anti-zionism of the left. One of the most important principle of the left is equality. Zionism required the exclusion of non-jews from Palestine. This inequality is unacceptable in any form of left politics. Explain to me from a socialist point of view why refugees should not be allowed to return.

Yes anti-semitism may be cloaked as anti-zionism but this is easily recognised. I am arguing for equality.


zionism this zionism that (part 2)

‘’Not all jews are zionists and not all zionists are jews.’’
This mantra has been repeated 100,000 and 1 times.
(Proverb - If you only have a buck-goat, be in the middle of the fair with it) .
‘’not all jews are zionists and not all zionists are jews.'
So what ? Not all women are feminists and not all feminists are women.
Btw, being ‘not zionist’ doesn’t mean anti-zionist.

Get the facts not the propaganda

anjapartanen@yahoo.se


Zionism is a philosophy that

Zionism is a philosophy that requires the rights of one people to supercede the rights of another. Those that believe in this philosophy may or may not be jewish. To oppose zionism as a philosophy has nothing to do with anti-semitism.

Yes you are correct "Not all women are feminists and not all feminists are women", but anti-feminists may not hate women. But anti-feminists are wrong since it goes against an important principle of equality.

What are the facts, these are difficult, but I would be gratefull if you could email me a link of a zionist site that supports equality of jew and gentile in Palestine, and especially the return of refugees.


I'm agree with Gehrig

''but anti-feminists may not hate women.''
Unfortunately,some (many?) antifeminist women do hate another women. This is about competition...

'' if you could email me a link of a zionist site that supports equality of jew and gentile in Palestine''

Do you talk about Palestine or Israel ? Or you could email me some 'zionist' link that not support equality of jews and non-jews ?

‘’and especially the return of refugees.’’
Can you tell me please how many refugees are alive now, after 60 years ?
Why you not concerned about 300.000 finnish (karelian) refugees who was expulsed from Karelia by the russians during winter war 1939 ?

Obviously you have double standard.

Gehrig answers to all your questions (though indymedia is not a ‘zionist’ site)
just click on the link
http://www.ucimc.org/newswire/display/15535/index.php


just a little contribution

I not belong to AWL