Would you vote for this man?
Performance data:
• Spoke in 0 debates in the last year — 646th out of 659 MPs.
• Asked 0 written questions in the last year — 545th out of 659 MPs.
• This MP never rebels against their party — 630th out of 649 MPs.
Which MP does this verdict, from www.theyworkforyou.com, describe? Some Blairite hack, no doubt? In fact it is the self-proclaimed arch-rebel, George Galloway.
In the 1997–2001 parliament Galloway rebelled against Blair in just five votes out of 665, 0.8%. (For comparison: Jeremy Corbyn rebelled 77 times, and John McDonnell 72.)
Galloway has only attended 19 parliamentary votes since April 2003. Too busy taking time out in his villa in Portugal, writing his autobiography, fixing up his next book (on Fidel Castro), or swanning around the Middle East? Maybe. But why should anyone want to vote for him to be an MP?
And when he did rebel in Parliament on Iraq, it was in favour of what? He was not “anti-war” in general. At demonstrations he applauded successful attacks on the US/UK forces by Saddam Hussein’s military. He was anti-Bush and anti-Blair — but pro-Saddam.
He says he was on close personal terms with Saddam Hussein’s deputy Tariq Aziz. He visited Iraq almost once a month from 1994 until the 2003 war, to meet with top officials there. He says that he offered the British government that he would be an intermediary between it and Saddam’s regime.
On 17 February 2004 the Guardian reported: “Fawwaz Zureikat, a Jordanian entrepreneur… gave money to the Mariam Appeal, run by Mr Galloway…
“[Zureikat and other] businessmen are alleged to have received money from Saddam via oil allocations. They sold the oil rights on at a profit of more than $1m (about £530,000), in an exploitation by Saddam of loopholes in the UN’s then oil-for-food programme.
“Mr Zureikat confirmed to Agence France Presse in Jordan last week that he had made the oil deals.”
Galloway replied only that: “It is hard to see what is dishonourable, let alone ‘illicit’, about Arab nationalist businessmen donating some of the profits they made from legitimate UN-controlled business with Iraq to anti-sanctions campaigns.”
On Galloway’s own account, he got in over £800,000 for his various ventures connected with Iraq between 1998 and 2002 from Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Zureikat. Galloway said: “If newspaper critics had focussed on the incongruity of a left-wing campaigner obtaining support for his campaigning organisations from semi-feudal monarchies and businessmen such as Mr Zureikat, who represented some of the world’s biggest companies in Iraq, that would have been a legitimate line of attack — though my defence would have been that needs must” (Independent, 25/04/03).
When Saddam Hussein met his lawyer Khalil Duleimi last December, he asked to have his regards sent to just three people worldwide: former US Attorney-General Ramsey Clark; former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohammed, and George Galloway*.
Clark has joined Saddam’s legal defence team. Mahathir made a speech in October 2003 in which he called on Muslims to unite against Jews who, he said, “rule the world by proxy”. “They [Jews] invented socialism, communism, human rights and democracy, so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong.” What Galloway has done to deserve Saddam’s greetings, readers must guess.
In the 2004 Euro-elections, Galloway had his Respect coalition present him to the electorate as “a fighter for Muslims” — “recognised by the Muslim world… married to a Palestinian doctor… deep religious principles… teetotal.”
During the election campaign, he was at pains to tell the press that he opposed abortion rights. In the Morning Star on 12 February 2005, he not only denounced the idea of open borders but endorsed a “points system” for immigration.
And what does he think about lesbian and gay rights? You can best guess from an interview with the Saudi Arab News, 17 June 2003**, where, a propos of nothing, he claimed that his enemies said he supported Arab causes because he was a homosexual, and retorted: “In fact I am not a homosexual, never have been and actually have never met an Arab homosexual”.
* At www.lebanonwire.com/0501/050201DKA.asp, and cited by David Aaronovitch in the Guardian, 29 March.
** At www.arabnews.com, and also cited by Aaronovitch.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version



Pathetic
Is this really the best you can do? Quote soft left people like Aranovitch and claim he doesn't support gay rights because he isn't gay himself! This really is scraping the bottom of the barrel. You take data from only one of his 17 years in parliament as an example of his typical attandence? He has won libels against 2 major newspapers, has won out of court settlements from the Christian Science Monitor, has recently won legal costs from Oona King, and ha been cleared of any wrong doing in the War on Want and the Mariam Appeal. You're just jealous that RESPECT is going places and Socialist Green Unity Coalition is most certainly not.
Going what places?
1. Isn't there something odd in Galloway assuming that all Arabs - all the many thousands he must have met in his extensive travels in the Arab world, anyway - are straight? And his "don't dare accuse me of that" claim that his enemies must think he supports Arab causes because he himself is gay? Has any of his enemies ever suggested that?
2. Galloway's attendance in Parliament? Yes, it was better in 1997-2001, when he scarcely ever rebelled. So you can choose between him attending Parliament and being docile, or not attending. What's the point of having him as an MP, either way?
3. He has the money to work the libel laws, no doubt about it. What does that prove good about him?
4. Respect is going places? Where?
YES but he is an opportunist
The man is clearly an opportunist with no integrity. Shaking the hand of a tyrant and then going on to form Respect to attract the discontented, anti-war Moslem vote. Incredible this still when you consider you did not see any pre-war anti-Saddem Hussein Moslem demonstrations either here, or in the Moslem world at large.
Hypocrisy makes good bedfellows!
Islamophobic racist bigot
Here on a supposedly socialist website we have someone accusing the entire Muslim world of hypocrisy. It fits in well with the snidey New Labour Blairite take on Galloway (do these people get their instructions directly or indirectly from Campbell?). The AWL is an organisation which harbours Islamophobes and bigots. Respect is the future of left politics in Britain. Into the dustbin of history with you....
It's called debate, you know
Comments are posted on this website because it allows open debate. Which is why we allow your very rude, inaccurate, apologist rants to appear on the website too.
I trust readers will hold you responsible for your postings, not the AWL. Or are you going to accuse us of "harbouring" you, as well?
By the way - does Respect allow a free exchange of views on its website?
Quetion time 31st march 05
Well done George,by far the most respected guest
able to answer all questions asked. You still have
the support of the people behind you,hope you do
well in the forth comming elections. Politics would
be boring without you.
Good luck to you and respect on May the 5th.
Lies about Galloway
Galloway was not active in parliament over the last year because he had been expelled by the Labour Party. It was the proper thing to do. Save face, wait for the Daily Telegraph action, and then run for re-election.
Do you think that if he wins in Bethnal Green & Bow that he won't be the most rebellious parliamentarian?
Every day, he travels around the country and is constantly in the media speaking about against the policies of Blairism.
You guys decide to quote Blairites and their apologists in attacking Galloway, HOW CURIOUS INDEED! You quote Ben Bradshaw, David Aaronovitch, Ian McCartney amongst others
Get a reality check...
For real accounts about Galloway, read Seumas Milne's preface to the latest edition of The Enemy Within, or http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,1068967,00.html
or this from CounterPunch:
http://www.counterpunch.org/waraich02242005.html
or even his book!
The proper thing to do
In what sense is it the "proper thing to do" to become inactive in Parliament because you've been expelled by the Labour Party?!?
Why is it 'proper' to fail to turn up and vote on important issues? To not bother signing, for example, RMT's Early Day Motions on rail renationalisation?
Is it 'proper' that his constituents go unrepresented while he "saves face" and awaits the outcome of a court case?
And if was 'proper' to be inactive in Parliament, why was it not 'proper' to resign the seat and allow someone else to represent them who was prepared to be active?
Sorry, but your line of argument here makes absolutely no sense at all.
And I think you'll find that the article quotes not the opinions of Blairites, but *facts* about Galloway that have been dug up by Blairites. Does the identity of the person who reports them make them *not* facts?
The title of your comment is "Lies about Galloway". Would you mind pointing out which statements in the article are 'lies'?. It's just that there is a difference between "Lies" and "Opinions I don't agree with".
Why don't you join New Labour
Why don't you join New Labour? Replaying their spin is much more effective when your not in some lunatic sect you know. Your quite good at it. You could be their press officer. But then your an organisation which calls the largest anti-war movement in history a 'so-called anti-war movement'. Did you get that from press cuttings of Labour spin masters as well? You of course would not understand that Galloway has played a big role in the movement outside parliament. Thats because you play no role at all (big or small) inside or outside of it. But I'd be careful if I were you. Showering contempt on ethnic or religous minorities is no longer politically likely to pay dividends on the left. The oppressed are standing up. They are active in our movement now. You can no longer just talk about people and patronise them. They are starting to talk back. And you will be in no position at all to deal with it. Your attempt to portray all politically active muslims as Fundementalists will be remembered. It will certainly be remembered by the new generation of respect activists coming through. Your politics are about as attractive as the Stalinist Communist Party in 1968. How on earth did it come to this? Its a question you should ask yourself.
Saddam also thanked Mandela
Can I point out that Saddam actually thanked four people from his prison cell - the fourth being Nelson Mandela. When the Express picked this story up they correctly included Mandela, but mysteriously both Aaronovitch & Yourselves miss out Nelson, presumably because his presence in the list takes away a bit of the "oooh spooky" factor.
Saddam told his lawyer Khalil Douleïmi (aka Khalil al-Duleimi ) “do not forget to transmit my consideration to George Gallaway who did everything to defend Iraq, to Ramsee Clark, Mahatir Mohamed, Nelson Mandela and all the free Arabs” according to an interview in Al Ousboua, an Egyptian magazine, as translated by a Tunisian website Babnet