Solidarity newspaper

WL magazine


 

Search Workers' Liberty sites using Scroogle


User login

Join the debate!

We welcome debate and encourage free discussion. Log in with a user name, and you can add comments to the debates on this site. We operate no political censorship, but we reserve the usual editorial right to delete or cut comments which are racist or sexist; advertising; abusive; excessive in volume; or otherwise inappropriate.


Navigation

Nike's Olympics start badly

Sweatshops

Nike's multi-million dollar Olympics advertising campaign is in jeopardy.

Marion Jones, the record-breaking American athlete accused of taking performance-enhancing drugs, is in danger of being barred from the competition. She is under scrutiny by the US Anti-Doping Agency.

Jones is paid $3m (£1.64m) a year to endorse Nike (from a total endorsement budget which now stands at an obscene $1.36bn a year).

But Nike has a record of standing by athletes involved in doping scandals.

In 1992 when Germany's Katrin Krabbe, the world 100 and 200 metres champion, tested positive for steroids Nike continued to support her financially before she was eventually banned for four years.

In 1997 Mary Slaney tested positive for testosterone and Nike continued to back her despite the fact she was banned and stripped of the silver medal she had won in the 1500m at the world indoor championships.

Nike also stood by the Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand after he was banned for eight months when he failed to turn up for a random out-of-competition test. He was in the first 12 months of a three-year deal with Nike worth a reported £270,000 per year.