Marxist Theory
Socialism and Democracy
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:19
Socialism and Democracy: Workers' Liberty special issue (no.17), January 1994
------
Download as pdf:
- debate from 1982 between Michael Foot, then Labour Party leader, and John O'Mahony, with a 1994 introduction
- appendices, including texts on socialism and democracy by James P Cannon, Max Shachtman, V I Lenin, and Hal Draper.
------
Read online:
Introduction: Democracy, direct action, and the class struggle
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 1)
Michael Foot: My kind of democracy (part 2)
John O'Mahony: Introduction
Chapter 1: Is Direct Action Against Thatcher Undemocratic?
Chapter 2: The Appeal to History
Chapter 3: The Scarecrow of Stalinism
Chapter 4: Superstition or Struggle?
Appendix 1. Labour Party: the sham of "one member, one vote" - John Bloxam and John O'Mahony
Appendix 2. PR, democracy, and socialism - John O'Mahony
Appendix 3. Marxism and democracy - James P Cannon
Appendix 4. The movement of the majority - James P Cannon
Appendix 5. 1917 was a democratic revolution - Max Shachtman
Appendix 6. Lenin on Democracy and Dictatorship
Appendix 7. Democracy in the Russian Revolution - Leon Trotsky (1918)
Appendix 8. An Eyewitness Account of the Russian Revolution- Hal Draper
Appendix 7 and appendix 8, included here, were not in the printed version of January 1994.
Marxism At Work: Inequality And Class
Submitted on 6 November, 2007 - 16:30
Between 50 and 60% cent of the population identify as ‘working class’. Despite the term ‘working class’ vanishing completely from the language of the Labour Party, the proportion claiming this now-unspoken identity has been fairly stable since the 1950s.
To be working class is to be at one pole of a pair. The other pole is the capitalist class.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Trotsky and 21st century socialism
Submitted on 24 August, 2007 - 23:38
“I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and the clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence and enjoy it to the full.”
Leon Trotsky, April 1940
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
'Apparatus Marxism', Twin of 'Academic Marxism'
Submitted on 22 August, 2007 - 23:59
By Sean Matgamna
Introduction
Watching the accelerating political and moral degeneration of the Stalinised “Communist International" in the mid-1930s, Leon Trotsky entitled one of his commentaries “Is There No End To The Fall?" Had he been forced to observe the contemporary “revolutionary left" during the Balkans war of April-May 1999 he might have addressed the same incredulous and bitter question to a large proportion of those who name themselves “Trotskyists".
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Help! Do you know where these recordings might be found?
Submitted on 8 August, 2007 - 18:17
The magazine New International, in 1950, advertises a series of "wire-recordings for socialist education". They include a recording of a debate between Max Shachtman and Frederick von Hayek, on socialism vs capitalism, in February 1950.
Workers’ Liberty and the “Third Camp”
Submitted on 7 August, 2007 - 22:02
By Paul Hampton
“The attempt of the bourgeoisie during its internecine conflict to oblige humanity to divide up into only two camps is motivated by a desire to prohibit the proletariat from having its own independent ideas.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
1917 was a democratic revolution!
Submitted on 4 August, 2007 - 18:07
By Max Shachtman
The 1917 revolution was one of the greatest democratic moments in history.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
What is Wrong with “One Solution, Revolution!”?
Submitted on 16 July, 2007 - 10:52
by Albert Glotzer
Many of the core activists of today’s left had their thinking shaped by the dramatic struggles of 1979-84, or of the late 1960s and early 70s — times when capitalism seemed to be in intractable crisis, and mass working-class action to change society was a prospect near at hand.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
What does "historical materialism" mean? Short explanations by Marx and Engels
Submitted on 4 July, 2007 - 14:31
Marxism at Work: Fat Cats and Poverty Pay
Submitted on 15 June, 2007 - 16:01
Recently, Network Rail chief executive John Armitt received a total bonus package of more than £200,000; his deputy, Iain Coucher, more than £179,000; the other two executive directors £133,937. And that's just the bonuses! Last year, Network Rail's four most senior executives shared £1.1m in bonuses. Armitt got over £350,000, on top of his £500,000 salary. NR, a so-called 'not-for-profit' company, has just reported a pre-tax profit of £1billion.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Marxism and ecology: clearing the air
Submitted on 30 May, 2007 - 21:59
Review of Paul Burkett, 2006, Marxism and Ecological Economics, Amsterdam: Brill
The conventional wisdom among Greens is that, so far as environmental struggles go, the organised labour movement is only occasionally an ally and often an opponent. Most ecologists dismiss Marxism as having little to offer today’s environmental concerns such as climate change.
- PaulHampton's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Socialism and Democracy: a Debate - Michael Foot and John O'Mahony
Submitted on 27 May, 2007 - 23:32
Click on "read more" to download the whole pamphlet as pdf, or to read it section-by-section online.
Socialism and democracy: appendices
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:11
Appendices to the Workers' Liberty pamphlet, with texts by James P Cannon, Max Shachtman, V I Lenin, and Hal Draper on socialism, democracy, and the Russian Revolution of 1917; and articles by John Bl
Socialism and Democracy: the Foot/ O'Mahony debate
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 16:08
Debate between then Labour Party leader Michael Foot, and John O'Mahony, in 1982 on socialism and democracy, with a 1994 introduction.
Marxism and democracy
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 13:15
By James P Cannon. This is an extract from Cannon's reply to a criticism of his court evidence in 1941.
Comrade Munis [1] is dissatisfied with our assertions at the trial that “we submit to the majority”.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
The movement of the majority
Submitted on 8 April, 2007 - 12:45
By James P Cannon, from Socialism on Trial, 1941. This is an extract from Cannon's evidence in the court where, during World War 2, he and other American Trotskyists and trade unionists were put on trial and jailed for hindering the US war effort.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Trotsky on democracy in the Russian Revolution (1918)
Submitted on 7 April, 2007 - 17:02
THE FATE OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY.
When, after Korniloff’s adventure, the paramount parties on the Soviets made an attempt to make amends for their previous attitude of indulgence towards the counter-revolutionary bourgeoisie, they demanded the speedy convocation of the Constituent Assembly.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Lenin on democracy and dictatorship
Submitted on 5 April, 2007 - 13:32
Lenin called for the "dictatorship of the proletariat" as a great expansion of democracy.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Hal Draper: An Eye-Witness Account of the Russian Revolution
Submitted on 3 April, 2007 - 13:53
The Russian revolution was the most important event of the 20th century.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Introduction: democracy, direct action and class struggle, by John O'Mahony
Submitted on 25 March, 2007 - 20:23
Note, March 2007:
Michael Foot, then leader of the Labour Party, wrote the articles reproduced here on democracy, revolution, socialism, and Stalinism in the Observer. John O'Mahony wrote the reply in Socialist Organiser.
Marxism at Work: Overtime
Submitted on 4 March, 2007 - 21:20
Lots of workers do overtime to supplement low wages. But while you might feel the need to do this to get by, the system of overtime itself helps the bosses keep your wages down.
Other workers, even if their pay is OK, might feel pressured to do overtime to keep the job running and save their workmates from carrying the burden of uncovered duties. But where employers can rely on workers doing overtime, you find that vacancies take longer to be filled. Why should the company hurry up spending money on recruiting, training and kitting out new staff when they can use the existing ones? Even where overtime rates are higher than normal rates, they are cheaper for the employer than hiring a new worker.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Communist Manifesto study course
Submitted on 30 January, 2007 - 09:32
A guide to studying the Communist Manifesto (PDF). If you prefer to download it as a Word file, click here.
Communist Manifesto - study course
Submitted on 30 January, 2007 - 09:28
A guide to studying the Communist Manifesto ('Word' file). If you prefer to download it as a PDF, click here.
The Resilience of Nationalised and Collectivised Property Relations
Submitted on 12 December, 2006 - 12:26
Russia is taking back energy resources into state control. The latest move is to take back control of the Sakhalin 2 project from Shell. It has used similar methods to that used against Khodorkovsky, the Russian oligarch, to take back control of Yukos. The state now owns the majority of energy resources in Russia through the medium of the state owned Gazprom. It has also used the huige financial resources of Gazprom to extend state control of other industries totally unrelated. For example, the majority of the media is now back in state hands with Gazprom recently acquiring further media interests.
- Arthur Bough's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Not a penny, not a man, for this system
Submitted on 25 October, 2006 - 13:12
In the summer of 1913 the government introduced a military bill… It was supposed to cost a thousand million Reichmarks for both new and current expenditures. However, the SPD confined itself to mere parliamentary protests; its members in the Reichstag even voted for the financial measures necessary to meet the military demands, because this time these were to be covered by property taxes. Even members of the party’s left wing (Radek and Pannekoek) advocated the passing of these measures. But knowing that nationalist and imperialist sentiments had moved many of the Reichstag members to vote in favour of the tax measures, Rosa Luxemburg underlined the principle that, in view of the rapidly approaching danger or war, the party should do nothing which might create even the appearance of expressing confidence in the government and consenting to its armaments policy.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
Ignazio Silone and the Third Camp: a challenge to the new
Submitted on 25 October, 2006 - 13:09
An interview with Ignazio Silone (1939)
In the event of a war between Italy and France, which country would you favour?
Tunisia
What do you mean?
The world is now divided into two great fronts: one composed of the conservatives, that is, of the democracies or other partisans of collective security; the other composed of the revisionists or fascists. Neither of these two fronts is capable of assuring peace or of solving the economic and political problems now confronting the world.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version
My political faith by Ignazio Silone
Submitted on 25 October, 2006 - 13:06
(January 1956)
I do not adhere to any system of philosophy, to any ideology, or to any orthodoxy. I think that all the ideological systems inherited from the last centuries, like the society that produced them, are in crisis at present — which does not mean that they do not contain some partial truth. I think that this has been the lot also of Marxism, in all of its variants. All metaphysics has lost its self-evidency.
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Printer-friendly version


